196 A. 679
Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 29, 1937 —
Decided January 26, 1938.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported i 118 N.J.L. 429.
For the plaintiff in error, Joseph C. Cassini.
For the defendant in error, William A. Wachenfeld.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Page 338