STATE v. GARRIGAN, 64 N.J. 287 (1974)

315 A.2d 385

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH GARRIGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued January 21, 1974 —
Decided February 5, 1974 — Amended February 20, 1974.

On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 126 N.J. Super. 442.

Mr. John J. Connell argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Henry F. Gill, attorney).

Mr. John De Cicco, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority’s per curiam opinion.

Page 288

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 315 A.2d 385

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago