STATE v. MALAY, 102 N.J.L. 225 (1925)

130 A. 920

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MALAY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 29, 1925 —
Decided September 10, 1925.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed i 3 N.J. Mis. R. 235.

For the plaintiff in error, Elmer W. Romine.

For the defendant in error, James H. Bolitho, prosecutor of the pleas.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Page 226