120 A.2d 92

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS MASTIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Submitted January 16, 1956 —
Decided January 23, 1956.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Page 429

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Page 430

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Page 431

Mr. Thomas Mastic, in propria persona, for the appellant.

Mr. Guy Lee, Jr., Gloucester County Prosecutor, for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Page 432

Tagged: