STATE v. McGRATH, 105 N.J.L. 251 (1928)

142 A. 918

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued May 16, 1928 —
Decided June 22, 1928.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed i 6 N.J. Mis. R. 217.

For the plaintiff in error, King Vogt.

For the defendant in error, Arthur H. Holland.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

Page 252

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.