381 A.2d 33
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued December 13, 1977 —
Decided January 5, 1978.
On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Daniel J. Matyola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart and Davis, attorneys; Mr. Martin L. Gilbert, on the brief).
Mr. Simon L. Rosenbach argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stephen R. Champi, Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 146 N.J. Super. 30.
For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 200
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…