STELLAKIS v. HASBROUCK, 113 N.J.L. 397 (1934)

174 A. 706

THOMAS STELLAKIS, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, STEVE STELLAKIS, AND STEVE STELLAKIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. A. HASBROUCK, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 25, 1934 —
Decided September 27, 1934.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 184.

For the appellant, William H.D. Cox.

For the respondents, Edward A. Weiss.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Perskie.

We deem it necessary to say only that there was evidence tending to show that the infant plaintiff was upon the premises by invitation, and that there was a breach of the duty owing to him by the defendant under the circumstances.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Page 398