STRUYK v. SAMUEL BRAEN’S SONS, 9 N.J. 294 (1952)

88 A.2d 201

NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN’S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued April 28, 1952 —
Decided May 5, 1952.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel).

Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS — 5.

For reversal — None.

Page 295

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 88 A.2d 201

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago