ROMANO v. DiDONATO, 128 N.J.L. 325 (1942)

25 A.2d 883 MICHAEL ROMANO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. RALPH, THOMAS AND LOUIS DiDONATO, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS DiDONATO BROTHERS, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, AND UNITED STATES CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted February 13, 1942 — Decided April 23, 1942. 1. Where an employee institutes a proceeding under section 10 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act to compel […]

Read More