Tax Court of New Jersey.Argued March 14, 1984.
Decided March 26, 1984.
Before Judges FRITZ, FURMAN and DEIGHAN.
Appeal from the Tax Court.
David W. Mills, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl, Fisher, Boylan Meanor, attorneys Susan A. Feeney and David W. Mills on the brief; Robert A. Reilert, attorney).
Maureen Adams, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Atty. Gen., attorney; Deborah T. Poritz, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lario in his opinion published at 5 N.J. Tax 209 (1983).
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…