307 A.2d 603
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued June 4, 1973 —
Decided July 11, 1973.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Page 412
Mr. E. Robert Levy, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Marcus, Rosen, Breslow, Levy Fischer, attorneys).
Mr. George H. Bohlinger, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have this day decided Shell Oil Company v. Marinello, 63 N.J. 402 in which we held that the public policy of this State restricts the unilateral right of an oil company to terminate, cancel or fail to renew a lease and dealer agreement with one of its service station operators to a situation where “good cause” for such action exists.
This requires that the judgment of the Appellate Division herein, affirming a judgment for possession entered by the District Court in a summary action for the recovery of premises, be vacated and the matter remanded and transferred to the Law Division for a plenary hearing on the pertinent issues. See N.J.S.A. 2A:18-60 and 61.
Page 413
For vacation and remand — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and GARVEN — 7.
Opposed — None.
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…