54 A.2d 719
Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued May 20, 1947 —
Decided September 12, 1947.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
For the relators-respondents, Hannoch Lasser (Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein, of counsel).
For the respondents-appellants, Thomas L. Parsonnet (Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
This case is controlled by our decision to-day in the case o Brown v. Murphy, 136 N.J.L. 183.
The only distinction is that the city, in this case, pursuant to statutory authority (R.S. 40:179-34), established and constructed a seaport and industrial terminal and the lands of the respondents were incorporated therein, and that the city was given the power to condemn by R.S. 40:179-34.
The judgment under appeal is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Page 194
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…