62 A.2d 506

GERTRUDE ULLRICH, complainant-respondent, v. JOSEPH ULLRICH, defendant-appellant.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May term, 1948.
Decided September 3d 1948.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Samuel F. Penza, for the complainant-respondent.

Mr. Simon M. Seley (Mr. Charles M. Grossman, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Our examination of the record and consideration of the various points submitted on appeal lead us to the conclusion that the decree under review should be affirmed. The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, JACOBS, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Page 735

Tagged: