WEISSBARD v. POTTER DRUG CHEMICAL CORP., 4 N.J. 115 (1950)

71 A.2d 629

MAX WEISSBARD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. POTTER DRUG CHEMICAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 27, 1950 —
Decided March 6, 1950.

Appeal from Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Sandford Freedman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder Kaufman, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph H. Stamler argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lorentz Stamler, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Freund in the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 5.

For reversal — None.

Page 116

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 71 A.2d 629

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago