235 A.2d 29
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.Argued October 9, 1967 —
Decided October 19, 1967.
On appeal from the Union County Court, Law Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. John W. Devlin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. O’Brien, Devlin Shaw, attorneys).
Mr. Andrew Lawrie argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lawrie and Jennings, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment dismissing petitioner’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Weidenburner in his opinion reported at 94 N.J. Super. 326 (Cty. Ct. 1967).
Page 265
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…