236 A.2d 885
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued December 18, 1967 —
Decided December 22, 1967.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Edward B. Meredith for appellants (Messrs. Meredith Meredith, attorneys).
Mr. Anton J. Hollendonner for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 N.J. Super. 235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 5.
For reversal — Justice PROCTOR — 1.
Page 6
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…