ZENTZ v. TOOP ET AL., 50 N.J. 250 (1967)

234 A.2d 96

JACK ZENTZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES S. TOOP AND MARION TOOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND/OR D/B/A LINCROFT SHOPPING CENTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN SIEGEL, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND FRANK CORDASCO, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 11, 1967 —
Decided September 25, 1967.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinions are reported at 92 N.J. Super. 105.

Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Burton, Quackenboss, Axelrod Rubenson, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Harth Enright, attorneys).

Mr. Marshall Selikoff argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent (Messrs. Jung Selikoff, attorneys).

Page 251

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. Mr. Justice Proctor and Mr. Justice Haneman vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS and SCHETTINO — 4.

For reversal — Justices PROCTOR and HANEMAN — 2.

Page 252